{-- EDITORIAL-IDENTITY-V1 --}

"America for Americans!" The Typical American, Thanksgiving Sermon — A Closer Reading

  5   0
Newman, John Philip, 1826-1899 Project Gutenberg 2007
Nationalism -- United States -- History -- 19th century -- Sermons; United States -- History -- 1865-1898 -- Sermons; United States -- Emigration and immigration -- Social aspects -- Sermons; Bible. Deuteronomy XXVIII, 1 -- Sermons; Thanksgiving Day addresses Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words: 10,918
Reading time: 48 min
Text sections: 2
Newman's 1886 Thanksgiving sermon uses Deuteronomy 28:1 to argue for American exceptionalism, restrictive naturalization, and a 'free church in a free country,' blending religious and nationalist rhetoric with pointed warnings about immigrants and papal influence.
Share

John P. Newman's 1886 Thanksgiving sermon, published by congregational request, opens with a striking fusion of secular and sacred authority: the president's proclamation has turned a 'secular day' into a 'national Sabbath.' From the first sentence, Newman positions the United States as a divinely favored nation, citing Deuteronomy 28:1 to claim God has 'set thee on high above all the nations.' The sermon's title, 'America for Americans!', signals its central tension—between inclusive religious liberty and exclusive nationalist restriction. Newman insists that 'intelligent foreigners approve my course,' citing a memorial from Wisconsin Germans demanding stricter naturalization laws. The text is a stenographic report, preserving audience reactions like '[Applause and laughter]' at his jabs at the Pope and Irish immigrants. This is not a detached theological treatise but a political sermon aimed at shaping citizenship and law.

The Typical American as a Religious and Political Ideal

Newman repeatedly invokes 'the Typical American' as a normative figure who embodies specific religious and civic commitments. This ideal American 'should set his face against all seeming alliance of Church and State,' yet the sermon itself is a religious address on a national holiday, blending pulpit and politics. The Typical American must maintain 'the Holy Sabbath-day'—though Newman concedes it can be called 'Sunday, after the old pagan god'—and must rest from labor for physical and 'pious culture.' This figure is also defined negatively: he must renounce 'all political allegiance to the Pope as a temporal prince.' Newman warns that any cardinal, bishop, or Jesuit who fails to do so is not a true American citizen. The Typical American is thus a Protestant nationalist, suspicious of Catholic hierarchy and immigrant loyalties.

Education, Intelligence, and the Limits of Secular Learning

Newman acknowledges that 'intelligence is almost a boundless power' but immediately cautions that it 'has produced as much evil as it has good.' He points to 'the greatest monsters who have damned humanity' as men of 'the highest possible culture,' and warns that 'the men who are sowing the seed in this country of discord are men of sublime intellects and polished education.' This skepticism toward secular learning leads him to argue that public education must be supplemented by 'home instruction, instruction in the church, instruction in the Sunday-school' to 'sanctify this intelligence.' The founders, he claims, recognized that 'private virtue and public morality' must flow from religion. This passage reveals a tension between Enlightenment faith in education and a Protestant suspicion of intellect untethered from piety.

Immigration, Naturalization, and the Boundaries of Citizenship

Newman's sermon is centrally concerned with who belongs in the American polity. He praises 'the Germans of Wisconsin' for petitioning Congress to restrict naturalization, framing their initiative as evidence that 'intelligent foreigners' support his views. He addresses immigrants directly: to the Irish, Italian, Spaniard, and German, he says they may belong to 'the church of the spiritual pontiff' but must 'renounce all allegiance to temporal pontiffs.' The line between spiritual and temporal authority is drawn sharply, and Newman insists that the Pope, as a temporal prince seeking diplomatic recognition, cannot hold sway over American citizens. The sermon's applause lines—'Stay in Rome. Live on the banks of the Tiber'—underscore the nativist sentiment. Yet Newman also claims that 'all religionists may come and worship here,' provided their worship does not 'infringe upon the worship of others nor work injury to the body-politic.' The boundary is not religion per se but political allegiance.

Readers should approach this sermon as a primary document of late nineteenth-century American nationalism, not as a systematic theology. Newman's rhetoric oscillates between lofty claims of divine favor and pointed political demands, revealing the anxieties beneath the triumphalism. The stenographic format, complete with audience reactions, offers a rare glimpse into the performative dimension of pulpit politics. Pay attention to whom Newman includes and excludes in his vision of 'America for Americans'—and to the biblical text he chooses to anchor that vision.

Related eBooks